Cori Ofstead, of Saint Paul, Minn.-based Ofstead & Associates and colleagues, examined 20 flexible endoscopes in a longitudinal study involving borescope inspections, microbial cultures and biochemical testing.
The researchers conducted three assessments over a seven-month period. Researchers processed control endoscopes with customary practices and experimental endoscopes with a rigorous process.
Here’s what you should know.
1. All endoscopes had visible irregularities.
2. Ninety-five percent of the scopes had fluid discoloration and debris in the channels.
3. Twelve scopes had microbial growth. Four scopes had no growth until after 48 hours.
4. There were no differences in culture results in either group, assessment period or endoscope type.
5. Both control and intervention endoscopes exceeded post cleaning biochemical test benchmarks.
6. Adenosine triphosphate levels were higher for gastroscopes than colonoscopies.
7. Eight-five percent of endoscopes required repair due to the findings.
Researchers concluded, “These findings bolster the need for routine visual inspection and cleaning verification tests recommended in new reprocessing guidelines.”
More articles on gastroenterology:
GI leader to know: Dr. Alex John of Vermont Gastroenterology
Study supports genetic testing for colorectal cancer: 4 key notes
RedHill Biopharma hosting R&D day on acute gastroenteritis, IBS-D treatment: 3 notes
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.