Experts see the ruling as a clear victory for health plans and a loss to providers. The case, Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., stemmed from the practice of health plans having provisions that shorten the time an ERISA beneficiary can bring action against the plan for civil remedies.
The ruling means healthcare providers need to be aware of the possible contractual limitations on claims and work to submit all claims and appeals in a timely manner.
More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
4 Ways to Make the ICD-10 Transition Easier
Market for Healthcare Business Process Outsourcing to Jump 10.8% to $189B by 2018
Massachusetts Price Transparency Law Problematic
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
