Joel Brown, BSN, RN, clinical director of San Mateo (Calif.) Surgery Center, told Becker’s ASC Review what his clinic does to monitor quality among patients and staff.
Note: This response was lightly edited for style.
Question: What are quality improvement studies you’ve done at your center?
Joel Brown: San Mateo Surgery Center tracks improvement activities through adverse events reporting with the online incident reports and complications reports. These reports reveal indicators for quality improvement projects; it also provides additional tracking and cross-referencing for recommending future projects (ones that would relate to incidents). This was previously completed by pen and paper with manual cross-referencing and records kept in a binder.
SMSC also tracks and monitors effectiveness and safety of its services through quality of care (post-op calls and incident/complication reports) as well as monthly, daily and peer-review audits (for both nurses and physicians). While the system contains data collection, the new centralized quality assurance/performance improvement program updates to accurately reflect the findings and tracks improvement projects completed.
More articles on surgery centers:
What controversies have ENT talking? 3 expert insights
Wyoming ASC appoints new administrator
The 20 most common ASC procedures
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
