Researchers placed surgeons in one of two group — the intervention and the control group. In the intervention group, surgeons received standardized monthly scorecards that showed the medical surgical supply direct cost for every procedure they performed in the past month compared to that surgeon’s overall baseline as well as surgeons at the institution performing the same procedure at baseline.
Here are four takeaways:
1. The intervention group lowered their median surgical supply direct costs per case by 6.54 percent.
2. The lower supply direct costs translated to $836,147 in overall savings.
3. The control group yielded opposite results, increasing their median surgical supply direct cost by 7.24 percent in the study period.
4. Based on these findings, researchers found giving cost feedback to surgeons in tandem with offering them a marginal departmental financial incentive was linked to lower surgical supply costs that did not impact patient outcomes.
More articles on quality & infection control:
ECRI Institute: Leading 10 patient safety concerns for 2017
Physician spending not correlated to patient outcomes: 3 points
Certified Professional in Patient Safety credential hits 5-year existence — 5 things to know
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 18–20 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
