Here’s what you should know.
1. The Consumer Product Safety Commission and several pediatric GI physicians spoke to the court about the dangers of the 5 mm magnets. The two parties were “frustrated” by the court’s decision.
2. Despite ingestion risks, the commission was unable to provide substantial evidence injury would occur. The commission’s data suggested “the risk of injury was a mere ‘possibility.'”
3. The court ruled in favor of the magnet manufacturers because the risk of “possible” ingestion wasn’t significant enough to conclude that the magnets would be harmful.
4. James E. Heubi, MD, professor of pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati and president of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, told G&E “We’re not thrilled with the decision. An organization spokesperson said, “[The ruling] doesn’t change the hazards that these magnets pose. The fact that they’re going to be back on the market is going to require pediatric gastroenterologist to be more vigilant.”
5. If children swallow more than one magnet, they could potentially become opposed to each other. Magnet ingestion has caused fistulas, bowel loss and one death after someone swallowed the magnets.
More articles on gastroenterology/endoscopy:
Exact Sciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals & more — 6 GI company key notes
GI leader to know: Dr. Deborah Blalock of Blalock GI Care
How investors reacted to Valeant’s $2.1B sell off: 4 key insights
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.