The AGA took issue with four particular aspects of MIPS. Here’s what you should know:
1. Cost category weight — AGA wants Congress to allow HHS to set the cost category of MIPS at a rate lower than the 30 percent required by law in 2019.
CMS set the rate at 0 percent in 2017 and has proposed to keep the rate at 0 percent in 2018. The AGA is worried CMS will not have the proper amount of time to calculate cost measures before the steep increase in 2019.
2. Performance threshold — Similar to the aforementioned cost category weight argument, AGA wants Congress to allow HHS to set the MIPS performance threshold at a level that’ll reflect physician readiness instead of what is required under law.
3. Application of MIPS to Part B drugs — The AGA wants MIPS payment adjustments to only apply to physician services and not physician-administered drugs.
4. Definition of a small practice — The AGA is seeking clarity over the definition of a small practice. They would like Congress to define a small practice as one that includes MIPS-eligible physicians only and not other health professionals.
The AGA and Alliance of Specialty Medicine sent a letter to Congress lobbying for increased flexibility. The AGA is meeting with several legislators to advocate for its proposals.
More articles on coding, billing and collections:
70%+ of physicians prefer FFS: 3 survey findings
Creating a competitive edge at your facility: The patient experience
Trump administration ends cost-sharing subsidy payments to insurance companies: 6 key points
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 18–20 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
