The AGA took issue with four particular aspects of MIPS. Here’s what you should know:
1. Cost category weight — AGA wants Congress to allow HHS to set the cost category of MIPS at a rate lower than the 30 percent required by law in 2019.
CMS set the rate at 0 percent in 2017 and has proposed to keep the rate at 0 percent in 2018. The AGA is worried CMS will not have the proper amount of time to calculate cost measures before the steep increase in 2019.
2. Performance threshold — Similar to the aforementioned cost category weight argument, AGA wants Congress to allow HHS to set the MIPS performance threshold at a level that’ll reflect physician readiness instead of what is required under law.
3. Application of MIPS to Part B drugs — The AGA wants MIPS payment adjustments to only apply to physician services and not physician-administered drugs.
4. Definition of a small practice — The AGA is seeking clarity over the definition of a small practice. They would like Congress to define a small practice as one that includes MIPS-eligible physicians only and not other health professionals.
The AGA and Alliance of Specialty Medicine sent a letter to Congress lobbying for increased flexibility. The AGA is meeting with several legislators to advocate for its proposals.
More articles on coding, billing and collections:
70%+ of physicians prefer FFS: 3 survey findings
Creating a competitive edge at your facility: The patient experience
Trump administration ends cost-sharing subsidy payments to insurance companies: 6 key points
