Associated Industries of Massachusetts, a business trade group, has pushed for tighter controls on spending than suggested by the House or Senate. Its former allies, including the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation, a research organization for employers, say tighter controls could lead to over-regulation.
Advocates say controlling costs is a more complex issue than expanding coverage, thus the division among formerly allied groups. Richard C. Lord, president of Associated Industries of Massachusetts, said the issue is contentious because it relates to revenue and income. “Every dollar has an interest group that represents it,” he said.
Consumer groups are also divided on the issue: The Greater Boston Interfaith Organization has publicly called for greater cost controls, while Health Care for All has not advocated a particular spending target.
Related Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
CMS Actuaries Bolster ASC Association’s Argument Against CPI-U
NJAASC’s Jeff Shanton: Where Is the Furor Over Aetna’s Out of Network Policies?
New York Bill Would Prohibit Health Plans Without Out-of-Network Coverage
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
