Anesthesia Provision Debate Continues Throughout the Nation

The debate over whether CRNAs should be allowed to administer anesthesia without physician supervision has continued throughout the country on the heels of Colorado becoming the 16th state to opt out of the federal Medicare rule.

Advertisement

 

In a letter to The Aspen Times in Colorado, Paul Rein, DO, president of the Virginia Anesthesia and Peroperative Care Specialists, expressed his concern over Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter’s decision to opt the state out of the rule.

 

In an online commentary piece by Kenneth Elmassian, DO, president of the Michigan Society of Anesthesiologists, in the Detroit Free Press, Dr. Elmassian challenged a commentary piece in the Baltimore Sun written by Catherine Gilliss, president of the American Academy of Nursing and dean of the Duke University School of Nursing, who lobbied for more states to out of the CRNA physician supervision requirement. Dr. Elmassian said, “Such thinking threatens the safety of patients, diminishes the rigors of a medical education, and negates the value of physician leadership in the delivery of health care,” in his commentary.

 

In an op-ed article published in North Carolina’s News & Observer, Alan Koontz, MD, president, and Gerald Maccioli, MD, director, of the N.C. Society of Anesthesiologists defended the state requirement that physicians supervise nurse anesthetists when providing anesthesia.

Advertisement

Next Up in Anesthesia

  • Workforce shortages, reimbursement declines and costly inefficiencies were some of the biggest anesthesia-related issues for ASC leaders in 2025. While…

  • As physician employment accelerates, anesthesia leaders say the biggest pressure points are structural rather than clinical. Anesthesiologist Jason Hennes, MD,…

  • In 2025, national anesthesia organizations recognized clinicians and researchers whose work is influencing patient safety, health equity, education and policy. …

Advertisement

Comments are closed.