Gastroenterology has been teeming with new developments in AI-enabled innovation as the field works to meet an increasingly high demand for services—and a new study sought to identify patients’ feelings on the rapid changes.
The study was led by researchers at Richmond-based Virginia Commonwealth University and published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology Feb. 2. The multicenter, cross-sectional survey included 265 invited participants from GI clinics and endoscopy units in Ontario (Canada), Missouri and Florida. Participants completed a 25-item questionnaire assessing AI familiarity, trust, concern and beliefs about physicians vs. AI roles.
Here are four takeaways from the study:
1. While 60% reported having limited AI knowledge, 61% believed AI could complement physician care.
2. Trust in AI was moderate and significantly associated with higher levels of income, education, employment and by region.
3. Concerns about reliability (60%), data privacy (47%) and healthcare costs (45%) were common, especially among racial minorities and individuals with lower education and income.
4. The vast majority — 93% — felt that physicians should retain final clinical decision-making authority, and 74% emphasized the im[portance of being informed when AI is used in their care.
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
