Here are four things to know, according to ACS’s statement:
1. A patient who visited both websites could potentially find the same surgeon rated differently, based on two groups using different methodologies.
2. ACS believes that use of clinically validated data would have more fully taken into account the severity of the patient’s condition when assessing surgeon performance.
3. The ACS also calls for private payers, government, professional societies and public interest groups to share the responsibility of collecting and disseminating accurate clinical data.
4. The OR is a team experience with many factors and individuals contributing to the outcome, thus, ACS believes that rating a surgeon’s skill in performing a particular operation, without factoring in these other considerations, leads to an incomplete analysis.
More articles on surgery centers:
11 tips for keeping HIPAA compliance in the digital age
Why patient safety needs to be prioritized—5 things to know
4 ASCs join price transparency website: 5 key points
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.