Four notes:
1. The plaintiffs argue that they have a right to “refuse and be free from compulsory vaccination for the COVID-19 virus and/or mandatory testing for the presence” of the virus as a condition for continued employment, according to court documents filed Oct. 1.
2. According to the staff members, their right to receive or accept healthcare services related to COVID-19 are protected under the Health Care Right of Conscience Act.
3. The plaintiffs argue that they will suffer “irreparable harm” from loss of employment if a temporary restraining order against the practice is not issued, according to court documents.
4. The order will remain in effect until Oct. 6, when a hearing will determine whether a temporary injunction will be issued against the clinic.
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.