Four notes:
1. The plaintiffs argue that they have a right to “refuse and be free from compulsory vaccination for the COVID-19 virus and/or mandatory testing for the presence” of the virus as a condition for continued employment, according to court documents filed Oct. 1.
2. According to the staff members, their right to receive or accept healthcare services related to COVID-19 are protected under the Health Care Right of Conscience Act.
3. The plaintiffs argue that they will suffer “irreparable harm” from loss of employment if a temporary restraining order against the practice is not issued, according to court documents.
4. The order will remain in effect until Oct. 6, when a hearing will determine whether a temporary injunction will be issued against the clinic.
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 18–20 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
