Here are six observations:
1. Providers must ensure their claims have adequate detail to support the ICD-10 code.
2. The industry should also be ready to deal with private and public payer audits.
3. Providers should consider using the CMS one-year grace period as a time to establish effective audit protocols. Although the CMS won’t deny claims in compliance with a correct ICD-10 code, it is unclear whether it will be as lenient with nonspecific ICD-10 claims resulting in overpayments.
4. In addition to the smooth transition process to ICD-10, the new codes offer enhanced data and the ability to compare health globally. Since the United States became the last industrialized country to transition to ICD-10, it has the capability to match up its population health outcomes against other countries.
5. As providers become more comfortable with ICD-10, there may be less productivity.
6. Some Medicare Advantage Contractors have rejected patient screening claims, due to poor local coverage determination system edits.
More articles on coding, billing & collections:
7 statistics on bundled payments: Do participants like them?
Healthcare officials crack down on PPACA enrollment rules — 5 things to know
Voters wary of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ ‘Medicare for all’ proposal — 7 points
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
