ICD-10: Ramifications of dual coding — 5 notes

Policy makers have implemented a six-month grace period in which providers will not be penalized for ICD-10 coding errors. However, the dual processing coding period may hurt providers rather than benefit them, according to HealthITAnalytics.

Advertisement

Here are five things to know:

1. Combining ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes will damage CMS quality, demonstration and risk adjustment programs.

2. The delay will be costly for payment reform, public health, healthcare delivery innovation and healthcare spending. A one-year delay is estimated to cost the healthcare industry approximately $6.8 billion dollars.

3. Dual coding will result in technical problems as well as lead to issues for data integrity, clinical analytics and quality reporting.

4. Additionally, the combination of the codes would confuse customer service staff as well as make it harder for fraud detection programs to identify abnormal billing patterns.

5. All EDI and processing systems would need to be reprogrammed, which is not a cheap endeavor. Reprogramming would result in more delays as it takes a substantial amount of time to change systems.

More articles on coding and billing:
5 things to know about Medicare Advantage
How ASCs can increase profitability — 8 key steps for out-of-network success
Health insurance premiums rise faster than income — 5 key notes

Advertisement

Next Up in ASC Coding, Billing & Collections

  • ASCs faced a mix of momentum and pressure throughout 2025. Procedure migration accelerated, technological innovation improved efficiency and new partnerships…

  • From high implant and supply costs to payer reimbursement pressures, ASCs are heading into 2026 with their margins squeezed from…

Advertisement

Comments are closed.