Here are five takeaways:
1. AACU said the proposal tackles the “inequitable” reimbursement differential between office settings, hospital outpatient departments and ASCs, although it doesn’t directly address the structural difference between ASC and HOPD payments.
2. However, the proposal was met with backlash from hospitals. The American Hospital Association said CMS was inappropriately characterizing clinic visits in hospital outpatient settings as “check-ups” by setting their reimbursement at the same rate as clinic visits in physician offices.
3. Hospital stakeholders persuaded 184 members of the U.S. House of Representatives to argue against the site-neutrality proposal on the grounds it may violate the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.
4. AACU contends the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 and the ACA unfairly “protect outpatient facilities tied to hospitals and enhance large players’ bottom lines to such a degree that cost-effective, efficient and patient-centered sites of care may soon dissolve.”
5. AACU said it’s committed to representing practicing urologists’ interests on Capitol Hill and in legislative changes.
More articles on coding, billing and collections:
Access HealthNet partners with Mankato Surgery Center & 2 more practices
CMS final rule implements site-neutral payments, AHA files legal challenge: 5 things to know
3 thoughts on managing denials from employer plans
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.