AIMS helpful in predicting OR scheduling errors — 4 points

According to a study presented at the 2015 annual New York State Society of Anesthesiologists PostGraduate Assembly in Anesthesiology in New York City, the Anesthesia Information Management System was found to be a useful tool for predicting operating room scheduling errors to boost OR efficiency, as reported by Anesthesiology News.

Advertisement

Researchers analyzed 44,503 surgical cases scheduled over a two-year period at West Virginia University in Morgantown to determine whether there were differences between predicted and surgical times.

Here are four points:

1. Jeremiah Jeffers, MD, an assistant professor in the department of anesthesiology at West Virginia University and one of the study’s researchers, reported around 79 percent of surgical specialties underestimate how much time they’re actually going to take in the operating room.

2. There was a significant difference in the surgical times that were predicted versus the actual times, of about six to seven minutes, in a confidence interval.

3. The three specialties with the highest mean errors, of which actual duration was longer than predicted, were pediatric cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery. The specialties with the best scheduling practices were urology and gastroenterology.

4. Researchers found pulmonary, organ procurement and podiatry consistently underestimated surgical times, where actual times were shorter than expected.

More articles on anesthesia:
How to maintain independence in anesthesiology
Mednax acquires Lighthouse Anesthesia: 3 observations
J&J drops Sedasys automated sedation system: 6 things to know

Advertisement

Next Up in Anesthesia

Advertisement

Comments are closed.