ASCs provide safe alternatives to hospitals for performing screening colonoscopies, according to new research from Emory University. When researchers evaluated the safety of the procedures in both settings and looked only at the complications without adjusting other factors, they found that ASCs were safer. However, when they took into account the other factors mentioned previously, they found that the risk of complication at both settings was comparable.
In another recent study, researchers examined the effectiveness of colonoscopy when sedation was administered by an anesthesia professional versus other providers by comparing the differences between polyp detection rates and the detection of colorectal cancer within three years of colonoscopy.
Although the findings were statistically significant in favor of professional anesthesiologist services, the margin was small and researchers were unable to determine whether the findings translate into clinical significance to justify the additional expense.
Read the news release about the quality of colonoscopy.
Related Articles on Colonoscopy:
10 Proven Ways to Profit From Gastroenterology in 2011
Educational Booklet May Enhance Colonoscopy Preparation
Study: ASCs Could Be Safer Than Hospitals for Colonoscopies
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
