Montana Surgery Center CON Bill Dies in House Vote
Billings Gazette report.
HB 306 specifically would have required an organization to apply for a certificate of need and conduct an impact study to find the ramifications of the proposed ASC on existing healthcare facilities, such as critical access hospitals, in a county with 50,000 people or less. Currently, a CON is required in counties with 20,000 people or less.
Montana Republicans killed the measure without discussion, a move that upset state Democrats who believed debate was necessary and "what the public deserves," according to the report.
CAHs, such as Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Polson, Mont., supported the bill, but larger health systems, such as Kalispell (Mont.) Regional Healthcare, opposed the bill, saying competition is necessary to lower prices.
More Articles on ASCs and CONs:
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2015. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.
New From Becker's ASC Review
Surgical Care Affiliates shares drop 1.29%: 5 key notesRead Now
- Tenet Healthcare named value stock to watch: 5 things to know
- Opportunities during times of change: Key strategies for orthopedic centers
- How robotic orthopedics programs can be financially viable in ASCs
- Prioritizing patient protection over data collection — 5 notes
- Code It Right conference provides tips for ICD-10 transition — 4 notes