Montana Surgery Center CON Bill Dies in House Vote
HB 306 specifically would have required an organization to apply for a certificate of need and conduct an impact study to find the ramifications of the proposed ASC on existing healthcare facilities, such as critical access hospitals, in a county with 50,000 people or less. Currently, a CON is required in counties with 20,000 people or less.
Montana Republicans killed the measure without discussion, a move that upset state Democrats who believed debate was necessary and "what the public deserves," according to the report.
CAHs, such as Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Polson, Mont., supported the bill, but larger health systems, such as Kalispell (Mont.) Regional Healthcare, opposed the bill, saying competition is necessary to lower prices.
More Articles on ASCs and CONs:
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2016. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.
- LifeBond's surgical sealant kit receives FDA IDE approval: 4 things to know
- What is the evidence for using FMT to treat IBD? 5 insights
- Saint Francis Healthcare System adds Dr. Jason Conway: 3 observations
- Premise Health receives AAAHC accreditation for health centers: 5 key notes
- Humana to leave most ACA exchanges after losing $1B: 5 notes