Study: HARM Score Measures Colorectal Surgery Quality

A measure based on hospital length of stay, readmission rate and vital status is a reliable and valid measure of quality in colorectal surgery, according to a study in Annals of Surgery.

Advertisement

Researchers developed and tested the HARM score (hospital stay, readmission and mortality rates) using administrative data to measure the quality of colorectal surgeries. They calculated a HARM score from one to 10 based on length of stay, vital status and 30-day readmissions for 81,622 colectomy discharges from 2010 to 2011. The average HARM score was 3.04 for emergent and 2.64 for elective cases. As the HARM score increased, the average rate of complications increased for both emergent and elective surgeries:

Sign up for our FREE E-Weekly for more coverage like this sent to your inbox!

Hospitals with a HARM score less than 2
Emergent: 30.3 percent
Elective: 15.2 percent

Hospitals with a HARM score from 2 to 3
Emergent: 41.9 percent
Elective: 18.2 percent

Hospitals with a HARM score from 3 to 4
Emergent: 49.3 percent
Elective: 24.0 percent

Hospitals with a HARM score 4 or greater
Emergent: 56.6 percent
Elective: 35.6 percent

The authors concluded that providers can use the HARM score to easily and reliably assess colorectal surgery quality.

More Articles on Quality Measures:

Researchers Develop Global Measure of Hospital Quality
7 Ways to Use Key Quality Metrics to Improve Gastroenterology Centers 

Surgical Mortality, Volume Predict Readmissions Rate 

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Uncategorized

Advertisement

Comments are closed.