Journal Editors Blast Studies Used by Critics of FDA Device Process

Editors of three prominent medical journals have questioned the methodology of studies used to attack the FDA device approval process, according to a report by Mass Device.

Advertisement

 

Democratic members of the House Energy & Commerce Committee had asked editors of the New England Journal of Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association to review two studies cited by Republicans on the committee.

 

The editors said one of the studies, released earlier this year by Stanford University researchers, was not fit for publication in a medical journal. The other study, prepared by the California Healthcare Institute and the Boston Consulting Group, “reflects little or no understanding of the complexity of medical devices,” the editors stated.

 

Read the Mass Device report on criticisms of the FDA device approval process.

http://www.massdevice.com/news/house-dems-take-aim-studies-critical-fda-medical-device-regulation

 

Related Articles on Criticisms of FDA Device Approvals:

House Committee Chair Accuses FDA of Overregulating Devices

Devicemakers Ask Congress to Ease Regulatory Burdens on Industry

Devicemakers Warn FDA Against Becoming Dependent on User Fees

 

 

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Uncategorized

Advertisement

Comments are closed.