Valuation of Intangible Assets Post-Acquisition

The following column is written by Andrew D. Galbraith, CFA, MBA, director with HealthCare Appraisers.

 

Accounting Standard Codification 350 - Intangibles, Goodwill and Other Indefinite Lived Assets (ASC 350) governs the accounting treatment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets previously accounted for as part of a business combination.

 

Increased merger and acquisition activity has resulted in a significant upturn of the number of intangible assets recognized on companies' financial statements. Additionally, changes in the regulatory and economic environment within the healthcare industry have expanded the necessity for the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

Under the Standard, these assets are not amortized, but rather are tested annually for impairment at the reporting unit level, as well as an interim basis if an adverse triggering event is recognized. If the test is passed, no impairment is recognized, and no further analysis is required. If the test fails, additional analyses must be performed to determine the magnitude of impairment, if any, which is attributable to the specific intangible asset.

 

Triggering events that cause testing on an interim basis could include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate;
  • Regulator actions having a potential adverse financial impact;
  • Unanticipated competition;
  • Loss of key personnel; and
  • Expectation of sale or disposal of a reporting unit, or a significant portion of the reporting unit.

 

In 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") approved an Accounting Standard Update that would allow a qualitative assessment of impairment prior to any quantification of a reporting unit's fair value. Qualitative factors used to assess impairment include the following:

  • Macroeconomic conditions;
  • Industry and market considerations (e.g., deterioration in the environment or regulatory development);
  • Reporting unit's financial performance (e.g., negative cash flows); and
  • Consideration of any economic factors that may mitigate any of the above, and lessen the likelihood of a triggering event.

 

Ultimately, ASC 350 provides the guidance necessary to determine if an impairment charge is necessary and the regulations essential to properly report an impairment of indefinite-lived assets.

 

Valuation Pitfall

In recent periods new legislation has been passed which can have adverse effects on the healthcare industry and could result in a triggering event as defined by the FASB. One example relates to reductions in government payments to Medicare Advantage, the private health plan alternative to traditional Medicare. The government currently pays the private plan an average of 14 percent more than traditional Medicare. The new bill reduces payments overall as well as shifts funding within the plan. Companies operating within the Medicare Advantage marketplace who have previously recorded intangible assets should consider whether a triggering event has occurred. These intangible assets include, but are not limited to, goodwill, trademarks, non-compete agreements and certificates of need.

 

For more information, contact Mr. Galbraith of HealthCare Appraisers at (303) 688-0700 or agalbraith@hcfmv.com.

 

More Articles Featuring HealthCare Appraisers:

Purchase Accounting for Healthcare Transactions

Andrew Galbraith Joins HealthCare Appraisers as Director

HealthCare Appraisers Expands Valuation Services

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.

 

Top 40 Articles from the Past 6 Months