NHSN May Be Superior Method of Measuring Healthcare-Associated Infections

Listen
Text
  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large
Traditional surveillance using the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network methodology may be the superior method of measuring and reporting healthcare-associated infections, compared two to other methods, according to a study published in the American Journal of Infection Control.

 

Sign up for our FREE E-Weekly for more coverage like this sent to your inbox!



For the study, researchers compared three methods of identifying and reporting catheter-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia: the NHSN methodology, data mining with MedMined Data Mining Surveillance and administrative coding with ICD-9-CM. The data collecting occurred in eight intensive care units in 2009.

Researchers found a total of 65 bloodstream infections, 28 urinary tract infections and 48 pneumonia infections. Surveillance through NHSN detected 58 bloodstream infections, 27 urinary tract infections and 41 pneumonia infections. Surveillance through NHSN also revealed better sensitivity and rate estimation.

Meanwhile, the other two methodologies detected fewer infections for all three types and had more false positives. The researchers concluded use of the NSHN may be the most accurate approach to reporting healthcare-associated infections.

Related Articles on Infections:

Mayo PJI Risk Score May Help Identify Patients at Risk of Joint Infections

New Jersey's One and Only Campaign Focuses on Syringe Safety in Outpatient Settings

Patient Safety Tool: 2012 Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Prevention Toolkit

Copyright © 2021 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 


Patient Safety Tools & Resources Database

Featured Webinars

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Podcast