Here’s what you should know.
1. The post argued while the reporters did review thousands of Medicare and postmortem records, the reviewed records represented only a small portion of the number of patients treated at surgery centers.
2. The post cited a lack of evidence that would answer “how patients would have fared had they been in a hospital, as opposed to a surgery center.”
3. With healthcare costs rocketing, the company said the move to surgery centers is an essential one. Surgery centers allow for procedures to be performed at a decreased cost, while still upholding high-quality outcomes rates. The post derided the article’s one-sidedness and called for an article that comprehensively “gives the pros and cons of alternative methods, as well as the benefits and burdens thereof.”
To read the whole post, click here.
More articles on improving performance:
Laser Spine Institute, anesthesiologist held liable for 2014 patient death — 8 insights
21 statistics on ASC annual case volume by region
21 statistics on hourly salaries, wages at ASCs
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.
