What you should know:
1. As it stands, the bill would require the committee to collect and review an array of ASC-related information. It would also require ASCs to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients.
2. The committee considered implementing a provider tax, as well as a proposal that would have granted the state’s approval body budgetary review powers. Independent surgery center advocates opposed both measures.
3. The committee wanted to find a middle ground to regulate the centers but not to the point where it would obstruct the public-facing benefits, said Rep. Anne Donahue, R-Northfield, committee vice chair.
4. Legislators said they didn’t have enough time to adequately vet a provider tax, and they felt the budgetary review powers would sap independent surgery center resources.
5. Green Mountain Surgery Center Manager Amy Cooper said she has concerns over the vagueness of the proposal. She said she’s “concerned that the language around the [care board] collecting and reviewing information from [surgery centers] is too vague, and it’s hard to understand what that means exactly.” Green Mountain Surgery Center will be the state’s second ASC once it opens.
6. The bill is now in the House Ways and Means Committee.
More articles on coding, billing and collections:
Dr. Kellen Jex joins Riverpark Medical Center — 3 insights
Capital Digestive Care reopening office — 3 insights
6 GI-focused ASCs, endoscopy centers opened or announced in March & April
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.