SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Health Plans on ERISA Claims Statue of Limitations

A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on that statute of limitations on ERISA actions found that a health plan can contractually create their own tolling period, which can start prior to a cause of action accruing.

Advertisement
Heather Linder

Experts see the ruling as a clear victory for health plans and a loss to providers. The case, Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., stemmed from the practice of health plans having provisions that shorten the time an ERISA beneficiary can bring action against the plan for civil remedies.

The ruling means healthcare providers need to be aware of the possible contractual limitations on claims and work to submit all claims and appeals in a timely manner.

More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
4 Ways to Make the ICD-10 Transition Easier
Market for Healthcare Business Process Outsourcing to Jump 10.8% to $189B by 2018
Massachusetts Price Transparency Law Problematic

The High Cost of Outdated Contracting in Health Systems — and How to Fix It

Recommended Whitepaper

Advertisement

Next Up in ASC Coding, Billing & Collections

  • What will transform ASCs in 2026?

    From rising patient demand to financial strain, four ASC leaders joined Becker’s to discuss the forces they believe will shape…

    By: Patsy Newitt

  • The titans of physician M&A

    A handful of major healthcare organizations are redrawing the physician landscape through aggressive acquisitions, vertical integration and high-stakes partnerships.  These…

    By: Patsy Newitt
Advertisement

Comments are closed.