Forget claim lag — here's the metric ASCs should benchmark instead

Written by Angie Stewart | June 10, 2019 | Print  |

ASC leaders should focus on improving charge lag rather than claim lag, according to Regent RCM.

Three insights:

1. Claim lag measures the time between the service date and when a claim is billed out. The advent of electronic claims processing made this action almost instantaneous, so it's not a critical metric to track.

2. Charge lag, on the other hand, measures the time between receiving coding from a coding company and entering those charges. This metric is a greater opportunity for improvement than claim lag.

3. Ideally, charges should be entered the day of service. If the lag is greater than 48 hours — which is the gold standard — it's important to look at variables that could be driving the increase, such as dictation turnaround or delays on the coding company's end.

More articles on coding, billing and collections:
Third-party vendor hack exposes nearly 12M Quest Diagnostics records — 5 takeaways
3 things to know about out-of-network payments' effect on ASC value
The changing bundled payment landscape for ASCs — What to know about risk, payers & future trends

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.

To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.