Dual Coding: Necessary for ICD-10 Transition But Time, Cost Consuming

Dual coding may be necessary to help practices implement ICD-10, but it will also cost money and productivity, according to a Government Health IT report.

Advertisement

Dual coding allows for the assessment of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 processes, including internal systems and medical coder knowledge. However, to cover the work increase, practices may need to hire additional dual coders or accept longer reimbursement cycles.

Starting sooner, rather than later, can minimize dual coding’s negative long-term impact on a practice once the Oct. 1 deadline arrives.

More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
Opinion: ICD-10 May Be Missed Opportunity for Productive Change
MGMA: Only 10% Providers Ready for ICD-10
3 Steps for Physicians to Take When Dropped From a Health Plan

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

160 ambulatory leaders just ranked the EHR as the single system most overdue for AI reinvention

Tuesday, August 11
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Presenter: Gautam Shah, MBA, FACHDM, NextGen Healthcare

Advertisement

Next Up in ASC Coding, Billing & Collections

Advertisement

Comments are closed.