Here are five takeaways:
1. Anthem filed paper on July 26 in a federal court in Washington, D.C., claiming its $48 billion proposed merger would lower consumer costs.
2. The payer also said the combined entity would offer coverage to more people and would allow the company to offer coverage in territories where neither payer is currently participating.
3. Anthem asked the federal judge to set the trial date for October as it its projected to extend for four months. The payer also asked U.S. District Judge John D. Bates to fast-track the case by making a decision nearly a month after the four-month trial.
4. The payer extended its agreement to buy Cigna until the end of April next year.
5. In its suit against Anthem’s Cigna acquisition, officials claimed the merger would stifle competition in a market that is already undergoing major consolidation, which is negatively impacting customers, physicians and hospitals.
More articles on coding & billing:
5 trends in healthcare payment reform: Does price transparency help or hurt?
With revenue hitting $21.46B, Anthem marches on with fight for Cigna: 5 things to know
Small mergers to likely flood the marketplace following DOJ lawsuit against payer megamergers: 5 things to know
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.