Morristown, N.J.-based Avalon Health Economics CEO John Schneider led a study assessing the opt-out policy’s impact on access to care and related costs.
Here’s what they found.
1. For inpatient cost, the opt-out variable’s coefficient was consistently positive and statistically significant.
2. The opt-out rule did not increase or decrease access in states.
3. The outpatient access models yielded less consistent results. In some models there was a reduction of access, with others suggesting no associated change.
The researchers concluded that opt-out laws do not improve access to inpatient surgical care or reduce its costs. Concerning outpatient models, the opt-out policies were also not associated with improved access to care.
More articles on anesthesia:
Anesthesiologist Dr. Clifford Char completes 25th mission trip
Ultrasound-guided anesthesia more effective than IV opioids for pediatric supracondylar fractures
Making the case for anesthesia ICU leadership
At the Becker's 23rd Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC + The Future of Spine Conference, taking place June 11-13 in Chicago, spine surgeons, orthopedic leaders and ASC executives will come together to explore minimally invasive techniques, ASC growth strategies and innovations shaping the future of outpatient spine care. Apply for complimentary registration now.
