Influential Anesthesia Journals Less Likely to Publish Negative Results

The most well-known anesthesiology journals are more likely to publish positive results than negative ones, according to a study conducted by researchers at Chicago’s Northwestern University and reported in Anesthesiology News.

Advertisement

Anesthesiologist Gildasio Deoliveira, MD, and Robert McCarthy, PharmD, looked at 1,169 studies published in 14 anesthesia journals between 2008 and 2009. They found that journals with higher impact factors — a measurement that calculates a journal’s level of influence on a particular field — were more likely to publish positive studies.

Positive findings were at least 2.67 times more likely to appear in journals with higher impact factors, according to the report.

Related Articles on Anesthesia:
Isoflurane and Desflurane Affect Cognitive Function Differently
Topical Anesthetic Can Reduce Pain From Intravitreal Injection

25 Benchmarks for Anesthesiology Practices

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

Unlocking Structural Heart Capacity: How Leading Programs Use EMR and Data to Improve Patient Flow and Throughput

Wednesday, August 19
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM CDT

Presenters: Katie Kennedy, MSN, APRN, NP-C, Community Heart and VascularMisty Theriot, BSN, RN, CPHQ, FACC, Lake Charles Memorial Health SystemKatie Worthington, DNP, RN, Atlantic Health SystemTaryn Shipley, MBA, CSSBB, Lean HealthTech

Advertisement

Next Up in Anesthesia

Advertisement

Comments are closed.