Dual Coding: Necessary for ICD-10 Transition But Time, Cost Consuming

Dual coding may be necessary to help practices implement ICD-10, but it will also cost money and productivity, according to a Government Health IT report.

Advertisement

Dual coding allows for the assessment of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 processes, including internal systems and medical coder knowledge. However, to cover the work increase, practices may need to hire additional dual coders or accept longer reimbursement cycles.

Starting sooner, rather than later, can minimize dual coding’s negative long-term impact on a practice once the Oct. 1 deadline arrives.

More Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
Opinion: ICD-10 May Be Missed Opportunity for Productive Change
MGMA: Only 10% Providers Ready for ICD-10
3 Steps for Physicians to Take When Dropped From a Health Plan

At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Register to Attend Webinar

Is ambulatory care healthcare’s big margin engine? 4 leaders weigh in

Wednesday, July 29
1:00 PM - 2:00 PM CDT

Presenters: Joe Ganley, athenahealthJeffrey Flynn, CASC, Gramercy Surgery CenterBryan Tsao, Access Center, Loma Linda University HealthJason Zepeda, Northridge Hospital Medical Center, CommonSpirit HealthGreg DeConciliis, PA-C, CASC, Boston Out­Patient Surgical Suites

Advertisement

Next Up in ASC Coding, Billing & Collections

Advertisement

Comments are closed.