Arguing that physician assistants cost significantly less to educate and hire, advocates of the bill estimate that Massachusetts could save $4 to $8 billion over the next 10 years by maximizing use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants as primary care providers.
The Massachusetts Medical Society opposes the bill, arguing that the legislation infringes on a patient’s right to access a primary care physician and poses a threat to patient safety by allowing access to a nurse practitioner or physician assistant when a physician’s care would be more appropriate. MMS also argued that the legislation is a means of increase bargaining power with insurers and public payers.
Related Articles on Business Office / Accounting / HR:
10 New Healthcare Administration Studies
Which Physicians Lead the Happiest Lives?
7 Best Practices for Driving Spine Center Profitability With Marketing
At the Becker’s 32nd Annual Meeting: The Business and Operations of ASCs, taking place October 29-31 in Chicago, ASC leaders, surgeons and healthcare executives will explore strategies to drive growth, enhance operational performance, navigate reimbursement challenges and prepare for the future of ambulatory surgery. Apply for complimentary registration now.