Home arrow News & Analysis arrow ASC arrow Coding, Billing and Reimbursement Issues
Coding, Billing and Reimbursement Issues
CMS Proposes Covering Bariatric Surgery to Treat Diabetes Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Wasek   
Monday, 17 November 2008
After an extensive evidence review, CMS has announced a proposal to revise its existing coverage policy for bariatric surgery to include type 2 diabetes as one of the co-morbidities CMS would consider in determining whether bariatric surgery would be covered for a Medicare beneficiary who is morbidly obese (an individual with a BMI of at least 35 is considered morbidly obese). CMS is also proposing to not cover bariatric surgery when it is used to treat type 2 diabetes in a beneficiary with a BMI below 35.
read more »
 
7 Things to Know About a Single-Payor System Print E-mail
Written by Howard S. Rubin, MP, PhD   
Thursday, 06 November 2008
With regard to Scott Becker's post-election observations, there are several points that need to be made with regard to payor systems.

First and foremost, I agree that the election of Barack Obama is truly momentous and represents hope and inspiration to people around the world, not just in the United States. I also think that Barack is reasonable and more concerned about outcome and results than pandering to special interest.

What concerns me most, however, is the comment about the Massachusetts plan and a one-payor system, namely the implication that a multiple-payor system is better, and that a single payor system is "horrible."

Why is a single payor system horrible? Are we really to believe that the insurance industry represents a better payor system? Some points to consider:
read more »
 
Use These 10 Benchmarks and 10 Best Practices to Improve Your Billing and Collections Efficiency Print E-mail
Written by By Rob Kurtz   
Wednesday, 29 October 2008

Efficient billing and collections is critical to the success and profitability of your center, and any efforts you make to improve efficiency can help you better capture money you earn and avoid your leaving money on the table. To help with your efforts, we give you 10 benchmarks to target for your operations and then offer 10 best practices to make meeting these benchmarks a reality.

Benchmarks
Use the following 10 benchmarks as good targets to consider for your ASC.

1. Days in A/R — Fewer than 45 for ASCs with a combination of paper and electronic billing; 20 to 35 days for centers conducting mostly electronic billing, which includes submitting electronic patient statements, suggests Vickie Sanders, vice president of business office services for Nueterra Healthcare.


2. Insurance verification — Within three to five days before date of service, suggests Alexandra Reyes, RN, administrator for Treasure Coast Center for Surgery in Stuart, Fla.

“You don’t always get an authorization at the moment when you make that call,” she says. “But as soon as insurance verification is completed, you need to turn around and call patients to notify them of their responsibilities, at least three to five days prior to their date of service. It’s only fair to make them aware of what their deductible or co-pay will be to avoid any problems on the day of surgery.”

3. Transcription — Within 24 hours or less after the the procedure is performed, if not before, suggests Ms. Sanders.

4. Coding — Completed within 48 hours or less. “The claim should also go out the door the same day the case is coded and charged,” says Ms. Sanders.

5. Claims billed out — Within 24 to 72 hours from date of service, suggests Ms. Sanders, with the higher-end target to account for possible delays caused by issues such as time needed to resolve any discrepancies concerning procedure information or slow dictation from surgeons, but 72 hours should be the exception and not the rule. You may want to consider a more aggressive benchmark — with the understanding that occasional issues will hold up the process — and target to have claims sent out within 24 hours, as is the benchmark for Treasure Coast Center for Surgery.

6. Claims follow-up — Within 28 days for those that remain unpaid, says Ms. Reyes. “All claims need to be touched, again, at least every 28 days until the claim is resolved,” she says.

For centers filing mostly electronic claims, you may want to keep that benchmark lower.

“We’re always looking to see if (our centers) are following up on their accounts in a timely manner,” says Ms. Sanders. “If they know they’re getting paid every ten days from a payor, then they should have a 15-day review if they haven’t received payment.”

7. Denial rate — 1 to 2 percent, suggest Ms. Sanders. “Tracking the reason you are not getting paid the first time a claim is billed is very important,” she says. “You need to identify the reason for denial and fix whatever the problem might be so that future claims will be paid the first time you bill, which will reduce the expense associated with claim filing and give you access to your cash that can be used for other expenses.”

8. Accounts per collector — Ms. Sanders suggests that a new center staff one collector per 350 to 400 cases performed per month. When reviewing your outstanding A/R, you should have one collector assigned per every 800 accounts, with the business office manager monitoring the collection activity closely to ensure accounts are being worked at a minimum of every 15 to 30 days, she suggests.

“We look at the number of accounts our centers have outstanding in their receivables,” she says. If the center has been open for awhile and there are 2,400 outstanding accounts, and a collector can only follow up on about 800 accounts per month or 40 accounts per day you would need three collectors to work through the entire receivable in one month.

9. Cash collections as a percent of net revenue — At a minimum, the collection goal should be 100 percent of your monthly average net revenue for the preceding three months, suggests Ms. Sanders.

“We track and trend this goal monthly, and if we are short in our overall collections for the month, the collection shortfall is added into the next month’s collection goal,” she says. “By adding back in the cash shortfall from the prior month to our current month’s collection goal, we anticipate at the end of the year we will have reached 100 percent cash to net revenue for that year.”

10. Aged A/R greater than 60 days and aged A/R greater than 120 days — Less than 25 percent of your A/R in the 60-day bucket and less than 10 percent in the 120-day bucket, suggest Ms. Sanders.

“We monitor our A/R closely, watching what percentage of A/R rolls into all buckets but specifically these buckets,” she says. “If the A/R starts to climb in these two buckets, a manager will review in detail what might be causing the increase in AR. The manager may add additional resources if necessary or identify that there are one or two accounts that are causing the problem and escalate the work effort to get these accounts paid. Monitoring your A/R buckets is critical in keeping your AR clean and not letting it get out of control.”

Best practices
Here are 10 best practices you can use to help meet your benchmarks and improve your overall efficiency.

1. Post your targets.
A terrific motivator for staff members is to put their goals on display and reward them when meet or beating the targets.

“Our business office manager posts goals and targets for the employees in his office,” says Ms. Reyes. “He does a monthly cash collections goal; front-end collections goal (percentage) and business office goals. It gives the employees the motivation to strive and to do better. If the staff meets the goal, I reward the center and we’ll go out to lunch. The entire center feels like they accomplished something.”

2. Post your figures.
A different approach you can take is to display the actual figures associated with your day’s work.

“We track our reimbursement on a dry-erase board in the business office area so each day we see how many cases we’ve performed, how much in collections was received and how many days out we are,” which is recalculated every day, says Di Sweet, administrator for the Brookside Surgery Center in Battle Creek, Mich. “My surgeon owners like to go by and say ‘wow, we’ve collected that much so far’ or ‘we’re that many days out, what’s going on?’ It’s a right in-your-face indication of your business.”

3. Conduct a “core audit.”
If a high percentage of your A/R is falling in the 90-day and over range, consider performing what Ms. Sanders calls a “core audit,“ which is a comprehensive review of what your revenue cycle, starting from beginning of the billing and collections process (scheduling) to the end (completing the medical record).

“We look at everything,” she says. “We make sure they are verifying insurance benefits timely and that they are tracking what has and has not been verified. We want our business office managers to know whether or not their business office staff actually called to get verification of benefits so that nothing falls through the cracks. We make sure that they’ve done their own precertification and not let the physician’s office do their precertification for them

“And even if the doctor’s office is getting the precertifications, the center is required to call the insurance company to confirm that the precertification covers the facility as well as the physician to avoid any potential pre-certification denials,” she says. “Also, as part of our core audit, we complete a chart review, which is based on 10 percent of the center’s monthly volume. We look to ensure that the chart is in complete order from gathering demographic information to ensuring we have adequate follow up documented to ensure timely payment.”

4. Instruct coders to code everything.
Under the new ASC payment system, ASCs must now deal with quarterly changes for reimbursement of drugs and ancillary services with Medicare. With such frequent updates, it can be easy to miss new opportunities to capture reimbursement.

To help ensure reimbursement isn’t left on the table, consider instructing your coders to code out everything in the operative note, as is the practice of the coders instructed by Serbin Surgery Center Billing, says Dawn Gray, CPC, CCP, its director of operations.

“Then the codes are put (through) CCI edits to ensure there are no bundling issues,” says Ms. Gray. “They (go) through what is and is not billable. This way they cannot miss any codes that may have been added to the approved list.”

5. Pay close attention to secondary payors.
For those cases which you are filing claims with secondary payors, it is important that your business office staff pays close attention to secondary payors’ rules and understands what they will pay you for or you could miss out on reimbursement opportunities.

This may become particularly important if the primary payor will not cover implants but the secondary payor will, says Ms. Sweet. If this opportunity presents itself, encourage your biller to take a little more time to work with the secondary payor even before sending out the claim for the primary payor. This will help ensure your biller understands what it is your organization needs to do to receive complete payment from the secondary payor. You may need to attach the primary payor’s explanation of benefits to the claim you file with the secondary payor to prove what procedures and implants the primary payor covered and what it did not.

While such caution may mean that claims take a little longer to go out the door, if the benefits mean that you capture a few thousand more dollars, the delay will justify itself.

6. Identify barriers preventing efficient physician dictation.
A common issue that can hold up the billing process is slow physician dictation. If this is the case, you should work to identify the cause and see what you can do to assist the physician in completing dictation in a more-timely manner, says Ms. Sanders.

For example, if your center is running three ORs at the same time and have cases stacked one after another and there are only one or two phones available in the sterile corridor for all of your surgeons to use, you may want to look into adding a new phone line or two to ensure all physicians performing procedures will definitely have the use of a phone when they want it, says Ms. Sanders.

“Or if the physician is immediately leaving the ASC (after surgery) to go to the hospital, look at what you can do to help him make sure he gets his dictation done at the office that evening or from home,” she says. Make it easy for the physician to dictate. Use a service that allows them to dictate from anywhere whether it is from the ASC, their office or home.

“Just try to determine what the reason is why the physician wouldn’t be dictating immediately after the case” and see if there’s a way to remedy the situation, she says. Your physician will likely appreciate the effort to make their dictations more convenient and your center will benefit from timelier dictations.

7. Be careful not to blindly rely on the clearinghouse’s messages.
The relationship between your software (and its vendor), your clearinghouse and the payors is a constant challenge, says Ms. Gray, with frequent finger-pointing and passing blame. Your software vendor and clearinghouse should have a good working relationship. The billing software should have batch reports that easily match uploaded batches in the clearinghouse reporting system.

“There are numerous reasons given for claims going into the black hole and you have to stay on top of the process,” she says. “Don’t assume that just because it is billed and shows ‘accepted’ by the payor with your clearinghouse that this means it is processing. Payors do not have standardized acceptance reports; every report looks different and often times doesn’t explain rejections. Have you ever seen the ‘loops and segments’ setup portion of electronic billing? If one small thing changes in the way the ASC submits the claim or the way the payor receives it, the claim seems to fall through the cracks during claim submission.”

Make sure that any change is communicated to the clearinghouse so they can properly set up and process the claims. By having this position — and dedicating a full-time staff member who does nothing but work as the liaison between the ASC software, clearinghouse and payors — Ms. Gray says the X12 conversion the software had to go through in order to prepare for the mandatory use of the NPI numbers went much more smoothly.

“Our biggest challenge here was the payors not being ready, and by having this position, we immediately knew if a payor wasn’t ready and handled the claim accordingly,” she says.

8. Hold collectors accountable.
With your collectors juggling many accounts, it can be easy for mistakes to occur. While the occasional error may not significantly harm your ASC, if it happens repeatedly and is not detected for a significant amount of time, the impact could be tremendous. Besides some of the methods intended to catch problems already described, consider ways to hold your staff members accountable and carefully monitor their work, suggests Ms. Reyes.

“The collections process should be very structured and you have to assign accountability to the individual that’s doing it,” she says. “You’re doing checks and balances; you’re making sure that person is actually doing what they’re supposed to be doing. We monitor (our collector) on a daily basis.

You look at the schedule and depending on what cases you have, what your payors are, you’ll know how you should be doing. For example, for Medicare patients, there’s no co-pay. If you see that you have a whole day of Medicare cases, you know not to expect anything in your money box.”

At the end of each day, either the business office manager or a billing staff member comes to the Treasure Coast Center for Surgery and takes the money box to the business office and reviews what was collected during the day, Ms. Reyes says. Through this process, any mistakes are caught and fixed sooner, and are less likely to be repeated the following day.

9. Try to get paid for high-ticket disposables.
Missed opportunities to receive reimbursement for your implants or disposables could mean losing hundreds to thousands of dollars, which is why you want to have a strong process in place to capture implant charges.

“If you don’t have a tight communication between your materials manager, the business office manager and the billing person, a lot of times you can lose money,” says Ms. Reyes. “It’s just the matter of putting a process together and making sure everyone is well-versed in it. Here we do high volume of ophthalmology and orthopedics, both which require high-ticket implants. As soon as we see that we have used an implant, the materials manager passes on a form — (describing) the implant that was used for the particular patient, for the particular case — to the business office manager and to the billing person so they know to bill for that implant right away.”

Ms. Reyes suggests implementing such a process even for those high-ticket disposables which you do not expect reimbursement. Her staff is instructed to try bill for any disposable costing more than $100.

“There’s only a handful of payors that will cover disposables and most of them won’t even look at it if it’s under about $100,” she says. “So anything that’s over $100, when in doubt, put it on. It can’t hurt. The worst that happens is they’ll save they won’t cover it, but at least you try.”

There are instances where payors will reimburse for the disposable and then you have captured potentially lost dollars with an easy process. Such a process will help that you do not miss opportunities because of recent changes in a payor’s policy, and it is also helpful to capture reimbursement when adding new procedures and specialties for which you are just learning payors’ rules.

“We’re looking to add GYN, which often uses expensive ($1,000-plus) disposables,” Ms. Reyes says. “Having the process in place already will help capture some of these dollars.”

10. Cut down time spent on appeals by documenting payor rules.
Payors may seem like they have their own “top secret” CCI edits because they are not wiling to share their rules or your questions about policies go unanswered or are answered incompletely. If you do not have a clear understanding of a payor’s rules, this can lead to significant — and potentially fruitless — time spent appealing rejected claims. Since the payors won’t always help you out, you need to help yourself.

“The best way we cut down on endless appeals was we spent time documenting the bundling code pairs and going through the appeal process for additional reimbursement,” says Ms. Gray. “In doing this, we were able to identify which codes will always deny when billed together regardless of modifier usage for a separately billable procedure. On those codes, we created a policy that when those code pairs were billed to that payor and denied, no further appeals would be done.”

Contact Rob Kurtz at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

 
5 Tips for FESS Coding Print E-mail
Written by By Denis Rodriguez, CPC, CIRCC, CCS   
Wednesday, 29 October 2008

With eight sinuses, six turbinates and two separate nasal cavities to consider, coding for nasal and sinus endoscopies can be quite a complicated undertaking. Here are five tips to help you code your functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) procedures accurately.

1. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS)
CPT code 61795 — “Stereotactic computer-assisted volumetric (navigational) procedure, intracranial, extracranial, or spinal (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)” — should be coded when computer-assisted endoscopies are performed. These instruments can be quite expensive, and although Medicare considers this code packaged into the code for the main procedure(s), commercial payors may reimburse separately for it. BrainLab, CBYON and InstaTrak are examples of instruments used for computer-assisted FESS.

2. Middle-turbinate surgery
Turbinate surgery codes 30130, 30140 and 30930 are specific to the inferior turbinates and should not be coded for procedures performed on the middle turbinates. The CPT manual instructs that you should code 30999 for resection and therapeutic fracture of the middle turbinate. However, there are two exceptions. According to the May 2003 CPT Assistant, when excision of the middle turbinate is performed with endoscopic ethmoidectomy and/or endoscopic polypectomy, it is considered included in these procedures and should not be separately reported.

3. Removal of sinus tissue
Review the note carefully to determine whether tissue is removed from the sinuses. More extensive codes (i.e. 31267 and 31288) can be assigned when tissue is removed from the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses. Check the note for references to removal of sinus lining, membrane, mucosa or polyps. Pus and secretions are not considered “tissue,” and drainage of such does not constitute removal of tissue.

4. Differentiate between 30130 and 30140
According to the May 2003 CPT Assistant, in order to code 30140, the surgeon must document that the mucosa was incised and, for the most part, preserved. The surgeon would remove submucosal turbinate bone through this incision. When radiofrequency (i.e. Coblation) is used to reduce the inferior turbinates, code 30802 — “Cautery and/or ablation, mucosa of inferior turbinates, unilateral or bilateral, any method; intramural” — should be assigned. Do not code 30140-52 for this procedure (CPT Assistant, March 2008).

5. Make sure the procedures are performed endoscopically
As simple as this tip may seem, I have audited quite a few cases in which the sinus procedures were performed via Caldwell-Luc antrotomies or frontal sinusotomies and not via endoscopy, yet the coder used the endoscopy codes for these. There are separate codes for non-endoscopic access to all sinuses (see the 310XX and 312XX series); familiarize yourself with these and use them when appropriate.

Note: CPT codes are copyright by the American Medical Association.

Mr. Rodriguez (denis.rodriguez@email. com) is a senior ASC coder and compliance auditor for The Coding Network, the country’s largest specialty-driven coding and auditing company. For more information, visit www.codingnetwork.com.

 

 

 
5 Best Practices for the Correct Coding and Billing of GI Procedures Print E-mail
Written by By Stephanie Ellis, RN, CPC   
Wednesday, 29 October 2008

Here are five best practices to help you overcome some challenges GI coding and ensure your ASC is properly reimbursed for the procedures your surgeons perform.

1. Upper-GI dilation procedures
Some patients will require dilation procedures when their esophagus becomes closed because they suffer from such problems as esophageal varices, achalasia, reflux esophagitis (GERD), problems after radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, scarring from drinking of poisons, certain medications that can cause ulcerations and esophageal “webs.” Some dilation procedures are performed with endoscopy, and coded from the appropriate endoscopy codes. Some are not, and when they are not, they are called manipulations (codes 43450 through 43458). These procedures may require the use of bougies, which are flexible dilators with different sizes increasing in thickness.

When performing bougie dilations, if an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is performed before a bougie dilation (where the physician does not perform the procedure through an endoscope) and if a diagnostic endoscopy is performed before the dilation,it would be coded as 43235-59 (per the AMA CPT Assistant).

For the dilation, use code 43450 for a dilation of the esophagus by unguided sound or bougie, single or multiple passes, or code 43453 for a dilation of the esophagus over a guidewire. For dilation procedures performed with a balloon, use codes 43456, 43458 or 43460, as appropriate.

When performing an esophagoscopy, rigid or flexible; with balloon dilation (less than 30-mm diameter), code 43220, the measurement refers to the maximum diameter of the balloon itself, not the diameter of the esophagus.

2. PEG tube codes
Codes for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes or jejunostomy tubes (J-tubes), which can also be referred to as buttons, are as follows:

Placement procedures:
• Code 43246 — Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; with directed placement of percutaneous gastrostomy tube.

• Code 49440 — Insertion of gastrostomy tube, percutaneous, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).
• Code 49441 — Insertion of duodenostomy or jejunostomy tube, percutaneous, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).

Replacement procedures:
• Code 49450 — Replacement of gastrostomy or cecostomy (or other colonic) tube, percutaneous, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).
• Code 43760 — Change of gastrostomy tube, percutaneous, without imaging or endoscopic guidance.
• Code 43269 — Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); with endoscopic retrograde removal of foreign body and/or change of tube or stent.
• Code 49451 — Replacement of duodenostomy or jejunostomy tube, percutaneous, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).
• Code 49452 — Replacement of gastrojejunostomy tube, percutaneous, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).

Mechanical removal of tube obstructions:
• Code 49460 — Mechanical removal of obstructive material from gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy, gastro-jejunostomy, or cecostomy (or other colonic) tube, any method, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s), if performed.

Tube removal:
• Code 43870 — Closure of gastrostomy, surgical.

Note: Stitches must be placed with a surgical closure to use this code. If no stitches are placed, and the tube is pulled and steri-strips are put over the gastrostomy opening, use the 49999 unlisted-GI code.

3. Colonoscopy procedures scheduled as screening with subsequent invasive procedures
Sometimes cases are scheduled as screening colonoscopy procedures, but the physician finds a polyp or performs a biopsy during the procedure, which changes the coding of both the diagnosis and CPT codes for billing. The latest Medicare guidance for the situation where a colonoscopy is scheduled as a screening colonoscopy, but a polyp is removed and/or a biopsy is taken is to not bill the G-code for a screening procedure but bill the appropriate CPT codes for the procedure(s) performed (45385, etc.).

On the claim listing of the diagnoses, sequence the screening V76.51 code first, followed by the 211.3 polyp or other appropriate diagnosis code. When linking the diagnosis to the procedure on the claim form, only link the 211.3 polyp or other pertinent code with the 45385 or other colonoscopy procedure code and do not link the screening V-code in field 24E to any procedure code billed.

4. Scheduling of colonoscopy procedures
When scheduling colonoscopies, it is important to know if the patient has symptoms or if it is a screening colonoscopy procedure only. Reimbursement can vary significantly based on what was performed. What can start out as a screening study can be entirely different after the procedure is performed. If a screening study turns into a biopsy or polypectomy procedure, not only will the coding change, but the patient’s benefits may be different, possibly increasing how much out-of-pocket the patient will owe. This benefits issue affects those patients with insurance other than Medicare more than it does Medicare patients.

At the time that the colonoscopy is scheduled, the ASC’s scheduler should find out from the physician’s office if the colonoscopy is being performed for symptoms or as a screening procedure only. If it is scheduled as screening, when performing insurance verification, it is very important to ask for the benefits information using very specific language, obtaining the benefits for both screening and diagnostic/surgical colonoscopy procedures.

Explain the benefits for both types of colonoscopy studies to the patient, so that he understands how much the he will owe in both scenarios — whether the test turns out to be a screening or diagnostic/surgical study. It is very important for the patient’s benefits to be properly explained to the patient before the procedure is performed. Patient’s financial responsibility information should be given to the patient in writing and should detail both benefit possibilities (screening and diagnostic/surgical benefits, if they differ). It is important to let patients know they have an obligation to pay what they owe and that what they owe can change based on what occurs during a colonoscopy procedure.

Detailed scheduling and insurance verification procedures are very important on these types of procedures. Your facility’s reimbursement fate is in your own hands. Detailed work on the front-end and proper/thorough explanations to the patient up-front can save your facility from bad feelings and adverse patient reactions after the procedure if the patient owes more than he/she expected.

5. Colonoscopy procedures
The screening procedures for Medicare high risk patients (code G0105) are covered every 24 months. This category for colon cancer means a personal or family history of polyps or colon cancer. Medicare’s definition of “family history” only includes the following blood relatives: parents, siblings or children.

The screening codes for non-high risk Medicare patients (code G0121) is covered once every 10 years. If the physician detects a growth and performs a biopsy or polyp removal during the colonoscopy, code the appropriate CPT code for the procedure based on the method the physician used and do not code the screening G-code. When there are two or more lesions biopsied or excised, bill the code for each technique used (biopsy and polypectomy method) once, regardless of the number of lesions removed, as each code is for the removal of a single or multiple lesions.

For example, if the colonoscopy is scheduled as a screening study on a Medicare patient and the GI physician takes three biopsies, removes two polyps by hot snare method, does tattooing of one lesion and removes three polyps using the hot biopsy forceps method, the coding would be as follows:

• Use code 45385 (once) for the snared polyp excisions.
• Use code 45381 for the lesion which was tattooed.
• Use code 45384-59 (once) for the polyps excised by hot biopsy forceps. This code must be billed with the -59 modifier because it is unbundled from the 45385 code in the CCI mutually exclusive table, but is separately billable because the three polyps removed by hot biopsy forceps were in different areas than those removed by snare.
• Use code 45380-59 (once) for the three areas biopsied. This code must be billed with the - 59 modifier because it is unbundled from the 45385 and 45384 codes in the CCI table, but is separately billable because the three biopsies taken were in different areas than the polyps removed.
• Code diagnoses as follows: Use code 233.1 for the colon polyps, 562.10 for diverticulosis seen during the procedure and code V76.51 for a screening study since the colonoscopy was scheduled as a screening procedure.

CPT codes are copyrighted by the AMA.

Ms. Ellis ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ) is president of Ellis Medical Consulting (www.ellismedical.com), a healthcare consulting firm providing chart audits for coding and documentation issues, business office operational assessments, research of coverage issues, fee and coding revisions, litigation support, reimbursement research, coding/billing training, and the development and implementation of billing compliance programs for healthcare providers.

 

 
11 Leaks to Plug in Your Billing Department to Ensure Total Reimbursement Print E-mail
Written by Hunter Howard   
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
Most offices leave from 5 to 42 percent of their potential reimbursement on the table because they either lack proper processes, are understaffed, their staff is not adequately trained or appropriately incented, or the office has not invested in appropriate technologies. This is money that you have already worked for and should have earned but that insurance companies are keeping from you.

We have identified 11 primary "leaks" that cause you to leave money on the table if you do not plug these holes or optimize each area. Here are these leaks and the common mistakes made that keep you from getting every cent you have earned.
read more »
 
Coder's Guide to ASC and Physician Practice Modifiers Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Ellis, RN, CPC   
Wednesday, 01 October 2008
Modifiers (usually 2-digits) are added to the main procedure code to signify that the procedure has been altered by a distinct factor. Modifiers are accepted by most payors. Modifiers can increase or decrease reimbursement. They can also cause claims not to pay properly or deny if used incorrectly or not used, when necessary. Some modifiers are for use by ASCs only, some for physician practices and some are for use by both provider types. Correct modifier usage is under close review by Medicare at the present time.
read more »
 
Average Charge and Payment Data for 4 Spine/Pain Management Procedures Commonly Performed in ASCs Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Wasek   
Friday, 22 August 2008
Here is the average 2007 Medicare sub charge (submitted charges divided by allowed services), average allow charge (Medicare-allowed charges divided by allowed services, including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient), and average payment (Medicare payments divided by allowed services, not including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient) for four spine/pain management procedures commonly performed in ASCs.
read more »
 
Average Charge and Payment Data for 15 Urology Procedures Commonly Performed in ASCs Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Wasek   
Friday, 22 August 2008
Here is the average 2007 Medicare sub charge (submitted charges divided by allowed services), average allow charge (Medicare-allowed charges divided by allowed services, including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient), and average payment (Medicare payments divided by allowed services, not including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient) for 15 urology procedures commonly performed in ASCs.
read more »
 
Average Charge and Payment Data for 7 Lower-GI Procedures Commonly Performed in ASCs Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Wasek   
Friday, 22 August 2008
Here is the average 2007 Medicare sub charge (submitted charges divided by allowed services), average allow charge (Medicare-allowed charges divided by allowed services, including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient), and average payment (Medicare payments divided by allowed services, not including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient) for seven lower-GI procedures commonly performed in ASCs.
read more »
 
Average Charge and Payment Data for 9 Upper-GI Procedures Commonly Performed in ASCs Print E-mail
Written by Stephanie Wasek   
Friday, 22 August 2008
Here is the average 2007 Medicare sub charge (submitted charges divided by allowed services), average allow charge (Medicare-allowed charges divided by allowed services, including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient), and average payment (Medicare payments divided by allowed services, not including co-pays and deductibles paid by patient) for nine upper-GI procedures commonly performed in ASCs.
read more »
 
Contact - (800) 417-2035
Employment Oppertunities
Most Popular Articles
Subscribe Today

© Copyright 2008 Becker's ASC Review

mDigital Design - Magazine Webdesign Solutions