Study: Peer Interventions Reduce Patient Complaints of Physicians
The Center for Professional and Patient Advocacy at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tenn., designed a peer messenger process to improve the behavior of physicians identified by unsolicited patient complaints as performing unsafe and dissatisfying behavior.
From 2005 through 2009, 178 peer messenger physicians at 16 community and academic medical centers intervened with 373 high-risk physicians.
Ninety-seven percent of the high-risk physicians received feedback professionally. Sixty-four percent of these physicians, called "responders," subsequently changed their behavior, improving their risk scores at least 15 percent. In contrast, 17 percent of the physicians who did not respond to the intervention worsened their risk scores, and 19 percent did not change their scores.
Physicians who responded to the feedback were more likely to practice in medicine and surgery than emergency medicine, have longer organizational tenure and engage in longer first-time intervention meetings with messengers compared with nonresponders, according to the study.
More Articles on Patient Safety:C. diff Infection Program Increases Compliance With Protocols
10 Most Common General and Specific Adverse Drug Event Causes
Anesthesia Providers' Hand Hygiene Under Fire: 16 Findings
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2017. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.
- Mednax acquires Nevada ophthalmology practice: 5 things to know
- Kenny Hancock joins Partners Surgical Corp. as chief business development officer: 4 key points
- Replaced Olympus duodenoscopes tied to new bacterial outbreak in overseas facility: 6 key notes
- Are municipal bonds right for you?
- Remedy Partners reports 7.7% episode of care savings through voluntary bundled payment models: 5 insights