Supreme Court allows payers to recover funds from patients — 5 key notes

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling preventing payers from collecting funds through liens, the St. Louis Record reports.

Here's what you should know.

1. The overturned case stemmed from Missouri. Kansas City-based Coventry Health Care of Missouri insured a man injured in a car crash through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act.

2. Coventry paid his bills and after the man received a settlement Conventry put a lien on a portion of his funds.

3. The man satisfied the lien, and then filed a lawsuit against Coventry, claiming Missouri prohibited "subrogation or reimbursement." The payer claimed the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act overruled other applicable laws.

4. The trial court and the Missouri Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the payer. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision saying the federal statute's scope excluded subrogation and reimbursement.

5. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the state Supreme Court's decision saying that Congress doesn't use "particular linguistic formulation when preempting state law," the Record reports.

Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Featured Webinars

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Podcast