Coding Experts Criticize Suggestion to Postpone ICD-10

A Government Health IT story that questioned whether ICD-10 should be delayed until 2016 met with criticism from readers who believe another delay is unnecessary, according to a GovHealthIT report.

According to the report, Seattle-based ICD-10 expert Mandy Willis responded that EHR, HIE, HIT and meaningful use cannot achieve maximum success with ICD-9. She added the new coding system is necessary because the code specificity and expansion prompt providers to think of healthcare differently.

Skip Stein, president of Management Consulting Services, added that some providers have already spent millions of dollars to meet federal mandates, and a delay would force them to use ICD-9 and ICD-10 simultaneously while the rest of the industry caught up. The respondents seemed to agree there was no good reason to delay ICD-10, considering progress that has already been made.

Read the GovHealthIT report on ICD-10.

Read more on coding, billing and collections:

-5 Ways ICD-10 Will Affect the Surgery Center Front Office

-CMS Implements New Policy for Portable Oxygen Equipment

-CMS Reassigns HCPCS Code Q1003 to a Deleted Payment Indicator: Q&A With Cristina Bentin of Coding Compliance Management




Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Featured Webinars

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Podcast