Aetna Reimbursement Policy Prohibits Payment for Facility Fees for Office-Based Surgery
A Center for Comprehensive Woman Health in Tarzana, Calif., received a letter from Aetna informing the facility that the payor would only reimburse for facility fees or related surgical charges in facilities licensed as ambulatory surgery centers.
According to the letter, physician offices that perform surgeries are not eligible for facility fee reimbursement. This creates a problem for office-based surgeries, which must perform procedures with similar overhead to ambulatory surgery centers without the same level of reimbursement.
Aetna responded to queries with the text of the original policy, which states: " For any surgical procedure, in order to be reimbursed for facility fees or any related surgical care charges … the entity must be properly licensed by the state where the facility operates. Specifically, the facility must be licensed as an ambulatory surgical center or whatever comparable title is used by a state's licensing law to describe a freestanding facility, other than a physician's office, where surgical and diagnostic services are provided on an ambulatory basis."
An Aetna spokesperson said the policy has been in effect since 2006.
The challenge of achieving adequate reimbursement for office-based surgery is not limited to California. Florida physicians Cory Lessner, MD, and Andrew Shatz, MD, who operate SightTrust Eye Institute in Sunrise, say they have met with resistance from payors.
"We believe that since our center follows the same guidelines as ASCs, and we are performing the same surgeries with the same standards of care, it should be reimbursed at a similar rate," they said. "This would allow us to cover rent, staff salaries, disposable supplies and implants."
In New York, too, resistance is growing. In an article on the "facility fee fight," Matthew J. Levy, Esq. and colleagues, wrote that payors have recently "sent out notices to hundreds of providers that not only will they no longer reimburse the physician for the facility fee in the future, they are also seeking repayment of claims paid previously."
The authors said this stance is in "direct conflict" with prior relationships between payors and office-based surgeries.
ASCs seeking facility fee reimbursement can provide evidence to Aetna of Medicare certification as an ambulatory surgery center -- but not simply accreditation by an accrediting agency, such as the Joint Commission, AAAASF or AAAHC.
Related Articles on Coding, Billing and Collections:
Former Billing Company Owner Fined for Improperly Disposing of Medical Records
ICD-10, Healthcare Reform Challenging Health Information Management Strategies
AthenaHealth Acquires Epocrates Mobile Provider
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2014. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.
New From Becker's ASC Review
House committee chairmen release joint statement on ICD-10 implementationRead Now
- The biggest stories in GI: 4 gastroenterologists look back at 2014
- The best defense: Anesthesiologist Dr. Stephen Punzak on the value of appropriate preop evaluations
- Total joints in action: 14 ASCs offering total knee replacement
- 10 key traits of innovative leaders
- St. Vincent Anderson Regional to open $26M surgical pavilion