Home 
Speakers Consolidation of Payors Harms ASCs: UnitedHealth Group Acquires Sierra Health Services
Speakers Consolidation of Payors Harms ASCs: UnitedHealth Group Acquires Sierra Health Services
| Consolidation of Payors Harms ASCs: UnitedHealth Group Acquires Sierra Health Services |
|
|
| Written by Rob Kurtz | |
| Friday, 29 February 2008 | |
|
UnitedHealth Group has completed its acquisition of Sierra Health Services, according to published reports . The continued consolidation of payors, as evidenced by this type of acquisition, has a very negative impact on surgery centers. Such consolidations provide payors with much greater leverage in negotiating reimbursement paid to ASCs. This increased leverage in certain communities is leading to unilateral and significant reductions in pay to ASCs. The acquisition also would have resulted in a 94 percent controlling stake of the Medicare Advantage health insurance market in the Las Vegas area had the U.S. Department of Justice not required United to divest assets of its Medicare Advantage business as a stipulation for approval of the acquisition.United and Sierra were the first and second largest sellers of Medicare Advantage plans in the Las Vegas area, which include approximately 82,000 people enrolled in the plans. United is the largest health insurer in the U.S., reporting revenues of approximately $75 billion. Sierra is the largest health insurer in the Las Vegas area, reporting revenues of $1.9 billion. Under the settlement between United and the DOJ to allow the acquisition to proceed, United must attempt to sell the assets related to its Medicare Advantage business to Humana Inc. If the two payors cannot come to an agreement, United will be required to find another purchaser. "This divestiture ensures that senior citizens and others will continue to benefit from competition between sellers of Medicare Advantage products," says Thomas O. Barnett, assistant attorney general in charge of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, in a DOJ statement. "We are committed to preserving competition in the health insurance industry because this competition spurs insurers to lower prices, enhance services, and offer innovative new products."  |
Advertisement
- Will the Federal Government Shut Down Surgery Centers and Physician-Owned Hospitals?
- 17 Orthopedic Coding Questions Answered By Stephanie Ellis
- Coder's Guide to ASC and Physician Practice Modifiers
- More Charges, Indictments in $154 Million, Largest-Ever Insurance Fraud Scheme Involving ASC
- 11 Leaks to Plug in Your Billing Department to Ensure Total Reimbursement
- 10 Benchmarks for Billing and Collections
- Preparing for Quality Reporting in 2009
- Senate Supplemental Appropriations Bill Would Ban New Physician-Owned Hospitals
- Non-Compete Agreement Imposed by Doctor Group on Physician's Practice Upheld by Court
- Fee Splitting Arrangement Between Physicians and Medical Biller Invalidated by Court
- 6 Trends in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
- 41 Things You Should Know About ASCs
- From the VMG Health Intellimarker: Revenue Per Case by Specialty in ASCs
- What is a good benchmark for total hours worked per case?
- 4 Steps to Bring an ASC to 100 Percent Capacity
Ambulatory Surgery Center
| Surgery Center Education |
| Selling a Surgery Center |
| Business Issues |
| Planning |
| Safe Harbor Surgery Center |
| Legal Issues |
| ASC Review |
Outpatient Surgery
| Business Issues |
| Outpatient Surgery |
Healthcare Business
| Legislation |
| Legal Issues |
| Business Issues |
| Clinical Issues |
| General News |
About Becker's ASC Review
| About Us |
| About Scott Becker |
| Exhibiting |
| Advertising |
| eNewsletter |
| Subscribe |
| Contact Us |
| Previous Issues |
© Copyright 2008 Becker's ASC Review
